latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-immigration30-2009dec30,0,4277224.story
latimes.com
White House prepares for immigration overhaul battle
The Obama administration is rallying allies to push for a package with
better border security and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants now in
the U.S. The effort is sure to be a tough sell.
By Peter Nicholas and Tom Hamburger
December 30, 2009
Reporting from Washington
With the healthcare battle still unfinished, the Obama administration has
been laying plans to take up an issue that could prove even more divisive -- a
major overhaul of the nation's immigration system.
Senior White House
aides privately have assured Latino activists that the president will back
legislation next year to provide a path to citizenship for the estimated 12
million illegal immigrants living in the United States.
In a recent
conference call with proponents, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina,
political director Patrick Gaspard and others delivered the message that the
White House was committed to seeing a substantial immigration bill pass and
wanted to make sure allies were prepared for the fight.
In addition to
the citizenship provision, the emerging plan will emphasize efforts to secure
U.S. borders against those trying to cross illegally. But that two-track
approach was rejected repeatedly in the past by Republicans and other critics
who insist that a border crackdown must demonstrate its effectiveness before any
action on citizenship is considered.
Whatever proposal Obama puts
forward will probably meet equally determined opposition. Another complication
is the calendar: Midterm elections are in November, and polls show that the
public is more worried about joblessness and the fragile economy than anything
else.
So embracing an immigration bill is a gamble for the White House,
which already has a packed agenda for 2010: economic recovery, global warming
legislation and tougher regulation of financial institutions.
No matter
what the environment, immigration is a tough sell, said Democratic pollster
Geoff Garin.
"We know from a lot of experience that immigration reform
has been and can be a very polarizing issue. There are heated differences about
whether there ought to be some kind of pathway to citizenship for people who
entered the country illegally," he said.
"And my sense from the
public-opinion research is people care more about vindicating their position
than they do about getting the issue solved."
Even so, the White House
apparently has decided to press ahead.
In an effort to enlist the kind of
business support that helped drive its healthcare initiative, for example,
administration officials have reached out to the National Restaurant Assn.,
which represents an industry that employs thousands of immigrants. Earlier this
year, the new head of the association, Dawn Sweeney, met with Cecilia Muñoz, a
White House aide involved in the issue, and expressed interest in
cooperating.
"It's an extremely important issue for our members," said
Sweeney, whose group could exert grass-roots pressure on lawmakers.
As a
candidate, Obama vowed to take up immigration during his first year in office.
That deadline will come and go. Further delay could anger Latino voters, who
came out in force for the president and congressional Democrats in
2008.
No one anticipates that a core element of the Democratic base will
defect to the Republican Party in November. But even a significant drop in
turnout -- which often happens in nonpresidential elections -- could frustrate
Democratic efforts to preserve their congressional majority.
"The bulk of
the people needing immigration reform are Latino," said Rep. Raul M. Grijalva
(D-Ariz.). "There's a level of disenchantment about where we're going. . . . And
if you don't give the Latino community a reason to participate [in the
elections], you weaken your base even more."
For an immigration bill to
have a realistic shot of passing next year, political analysts said, the
particulars would have to be agreed upon by the spring. A delay would increase
the likelihood of the issue getting derailed by the November
elections.
Henry G. Cisneros, a Cabinet secretary in the Clinton
administration who took part in the recent immigration conference call with the
Obama White House, said: "It gets much more difficult as the year goes along. So
everyone has to be very sober about the prospects. But the president and
congressional leadership understand it's important to start the ball
rolling."
An immigration bill was introduced in the House earlier in the
month, and Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who chairs a subcommittee on
immigration, is heading the effort to cobble together a bipartisan coalition in
the Senate.
But Democrats may not have a lock on one prominent Republican
who has worked in the past to revamp the immigration system: Arizona Sen. John
McCain.
McCain backed President George W. Bush's failed attempt to
overhaul immigration in his second term. But he has not committed to supporting
the Obama bill, saying he worried the president would not endorse a temporary
guest-worker program.
Organized labor, an important part of the
Democratic base, has voiced opposition to a guest-worker program under which
more immigrants could enter the country on a temporary basis. Critics argue that
there is no effective system for ensuring that such workers will leave the
country when their permits expire.
"From everything that we hear right
now, the temporary guest-worker program won't be addressed in immigration
reform. And unless that is an essential part of the reform program, it's
something that Sen. McCain can't work on," said Brooke Buchanan, a spokeswoman
for the Arizona lawmaker.
The White House would not reveal its position
on the guest-worker issue.
Should an immigration bill gain traction,
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel would probably be a central player in
the negotiations.
As an aide to President Clinton, Emanuel co-wrote a
memo on the political dynamics of immigration. He and Ron Klain, now the top
aide to Vice President Joe Biden, wrote in 1994: "We must be seen as taking
proper, forceful steps to seriously address the immigration problem without
alienating the Hispanic and civil rights constituencies.
"Our goal is not
to outdo the Republicans, rather to use our achievements and proposals to
prevent them from using this as a wedge issue against us."
The former
head of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Doris Meissner, recalled
that Emanuel once phoned and berated her over a news story about lax border
enforcement in Arizona.
"This kind of press is killing us," Meissner
quoted Emanuel as saying. During the call, he instructed her to send border
agents to the area immediately. "He had no authority whatsoever to give me
orders," Meissner said.
But Emanuel was constantly pressing his
colleagues in the Clinton White House to push what he termed a "balanced"
immigration policy -- including enforcement and stepped-up grants of
citizenship.
peter.nicholas@latimes.com
tom.hamburger@latimes.com
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times